Drew, if that is the case, how do we know which books are from God and which are not? Will that link go into that?
The link provided (which goes to Bart Ehrmans intoductory text on the historical New Testament) discusses the complexity of discovering the "real bible". The book does a great job at giving the reader a better idea of what is going on in the world of New Testament scholarship. For instance, it introduces the readers to good bit of evidence that throws doubt on the traditional opinions of authorship for some NT books (especially Hebrews, as well as 1 Timothy, and more).
Taking the time to learn more about the context of the bible certainly creates a more nuanced view of the texts. I think the important thing to realize is that there are two components to "the Bible". There is the text (which can sometimes be disputable due to variations in manuscripts), but also there is the stuff that people (i.e. you, me, and everybody else) puts on top of that text. This includes ideas like "the bible is a letter from god to his children", or "the Bible tells a story about life from beginning to end". The Witnesses, for example, love to talk about how the "theme of the Bible is Gods restoration of Paradise".
Where do these things come from? From the text itself? No. You cannot explicitly find these things inside the text itself. Rather, people read these things into the text. Getting away from this mindset is liberating, regardless of whether or not you eventually decide to be a christian (or jew, or whatever else!)